About me

Name: Ivan Kartik
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
I'm working as Senior Database Administrator in Bratislava, Slovak Republic. My interests are in RDBMS mainly Oracle, Unix (like) operating systems and in free time I am watching or playing ice-hockey, also I like to play golf.

[contact me]


Oracle (favourite) links

Oracle Technology Network
OTN Forums
Oracle Documentation
Ask Tom


Linux (favourite) links

Linux.com Portal
Linux section on OTN
The Linux Documentation Project


Favourite Blogs

Nicolas Gasparotto
Hans Forbrich
Jonathan Lewis
Frits Hoogland
H.Tonguç YIlmaz
Laurent Schneider
Christopher Jones
Jeff Hunter
Oracle WTF


My install articles

9i
Oracle 9i(R2) on Fedora 2,3,4,5,6
Oracle 9i(R2) on Enteprise Linux 4
Oracle 9i(R2) on SuSE 9.x,10.1
10g
Oracle 10g(R2) on EL and RH EL 3,4,5
Oracle 10g(R2) on Fedora 2,3,4
Oracle 10g(R2) on SuSE 9.x
Oracle 10g(R2) on Solaris 10 x86
11g
Oracle 11g(R1) on EL and RH EL 4,5
Oracle 11g(R1) on SLES10 and OpenSuSE
Oracle 11g(R2) on Solaris x86(64)


Downloads

rlwrap for Fedora (x86)
rlwrap for Redhat (x86)
rlwrap for SuSE (x86)
rlwrap for Redhat (x86_64)
rlwrap for Suse (x86_64)
rlwrap for Solaris 10 (x86)
readline for Solaris 10 (x86)
rlwrap for Solaris (SPARC 64)
readline for Solaris (SPARC 64)


Archives

January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
February 2009
January 2009
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006



Oracle Database patchset 10.2.0.4 for Linux x86 released

Oracle Database patchset 10.2.0.4 for Linux x86 is available for download (patch nr.:6810189).

Update:
But password protected.

Update II.
Unlocked.

Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 Comments [0]


Is a RTFM/STFW an answer?

Yesterday I was reading Hector's blog where he described "Forums Code of Conduct". Generally I agree with all paragraphs except the 12 where we can find text as following:

"RTFM is not an answer. I have seen several times self-qualified senior level whatever providing this kind of answers. RTFM is equal as saying "don't bother me, stop @%##~ me", and this is not an acceptable technical answer, specially for those who pretend to be self qualified as senior."

"RTFM is not an answer." - I can't agree with this point. In my opinion RTFM is an answer which could be also interpreted "Don't be lazy to read basics". Especially if questions are taken from some "braindump" list of questions for certification.

Btw look at 5th paragraph:
"Search before you post. Don't try to reinvent the
wheel when someone else has already done it for you. A suitable answer can be
found, a 10 minute goggling effort could find you an answer."


In my opinon "Search before you post" = STFW (which is younger sister of RTFM) because RTFM we can rewrite to "Read before you post".

In fact many users are using RTFM or STFW regulary in their answers on OTN
forums but they do it a smart way (rather than rude way).
Because RTFM/STFW could be posted in many forms for example:
- hyperlink to documentation (specific section in documentation related to topic)
- man
- hyperlink to Google results for exact search phrase

In my opinion RTFM and STFW definitely is an answer but it depends in which form you post it.

Forums Code of Conduct are described in great document How To Ask Questions The Smart Way which is available on Internet since 2001 and still(!) updated.
It also explains why you can get RTFM/STFW answer on your question or what the
poster of this answer want to tell you.

Note, this post is not an offense on Hector's person or as criticism of his blog
post. It only represents my opions. In fact I like Hector's posts and
especially on OTN forums.

Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 Comments [2]